Heres a picture of the diminishing Two-State solution of Palestine. As you can see, throughout the years Palestines land mass has severly limited:
Settlements are obstacles of peace; the expansion of settlements means the destruction of Palestinian controlled land. The settlers who take control of the land are often willing to use violence to maintain their lifestyle. In 2008, 112 people were injured due to settlement disputes. Settlements are often created in areas with vital resources and accessible transportation. Speaking of resources, did you know that Israeli settlers consume 240 liters of water per day, compared to the 86 liters available to Palestinians? The recommended minimum is 100 liters and the settlements are disrupting the availability of such an important resource to the Arab community.
These settlements prove to be the breaking point in Palestinian patience. I personally think that the Israeli community is overstepping their boundaries. Settlements, in my opinion, are just an invasion of land through illegal methods. What is your opinion on Israeli settlements? Are they just justified land grabs or an infliction on human rights? Please comment!
Israeli Settlements. (2010, March 15). Palestine Monitor, Exposing
Life Under Occupation. Retrieved June 9, 2011, from
http://www.palestinemonitor.org/spip/spip.php?article7

I think the Jewish community has a right to place settlements inside Palestine. Although it disregards territorial agreements, Israel is the homeland for the Jewish community and is backed by the United Nations. If they wish to expand their borders they should do so. The Palestinian community does not cooperate well with policy; they use terrorism to place fear in the Jewish community. I think HAMAS is a greater atrocity than Israeli settlements.
ReplyDelete